Market Snapshot: Where and how is carbon dioxide stored in Canada?
Connect/Contact Us
Please send comments, questions, or suggestions for Market Snapshot topics to snapshots@cer-rec.gc.ca
Release date: 2025-01-08
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be reduced with carbon management practices, tools and other abatement, strategiesFootnote 1, inlcuding technologies that remove, or re-use carbon dioxide (CO2).Footnote 2 CO2 is stored naturally in many forms (i.e. carbon sink)—in the ocean, in soils, and in trees—however these forms do not necessarily store CO2 permanently and might not pair directly to a CO2 production sourceFootnote 3. Artificial carbon sinks, like most carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects in operation today, inject CO2 into deep geological formations, which is a long-term, or permanent, way to store large quantities of CO2, preventing its release into the atmosphere.
Geological carbon storage traps injected CO2 in a similar way as oil and gas reservoirs. Geological carbon storage reservoirs can include saline (saltwater) aquifers, depleted oil and gas fields, mature oil fieldsFootnote 4Footnote 5 or un-mineable coal seamsFootnote 6 (Figure 1). Globally, most CCS projects are onshore; however, some offshore projects exist, injecting CO2 into sub-seabed geological formations.
What makes a good CO2 storage reservoir?
CO2 storage reservoirs are rock formations with interconnected pores—small holes and voids between mineral grains—that can be filled with CO2.
Figure 1: Diagram of onshore and offshore CO2 storage reservoirs
Source and Description
Source: IEA
Description: This infographic shows the structure of CO2 storage reservoirs in onshore and offshore locations. A CO2 storage reservoir has layers: the overburden (the top layer of rock and soil over the CO2 storage formation), the caprock (the layer of impermeable rock that seals the reservoir), the reservoir (a layer of porous and highly permeable rock that stores the CO2) and the lower caprock layer sealing the bottom of the reservoir. Injector wells inject CO2 in the reservoir, where the CO2 is stored permanently.
An ideal CO2 storage reservoir will have high porosity and high permeability, which will allow large volumes to be injected and stored in the reservoir over time. In addition to these properties, a suitable geological carbon storage reservoir needs to have the followingFootnote 7:
- Normal, or below-normal, reservoir pressure to allow higher CO2 injection rates.
- Depth greater than 800 meters, where subsurface pressure is high enough to keep CO2 in its densest and most compressed state (supercritical state).
- For example, non-EOR CO2 storage is required at least 1 kilometer below the surface in AlbertaFootnote 8.
- A configuration called “a trap” to contain the CO2 in the reservoir and prevent it from migrating.
- Enough capacity to receive the planned annual volumes of injected CO2 over the life of the project (typically 20 years or more).
Since the 1970s, CO2 has been injected into older oil fields for enhanced oil recovery with CCS (EOR-CCS). In Canada and globally, EOR established the commercial viability of early CCS projects and helped create economic value for CO2, before carbon pricing policies, enabling some of the world’s first CCS projects. (Table 1)
Table 1: CO2 Storage Facilities operating in western Canada
Carbon Storage Facility | Start Up | Province | CO2 Storage Location | CO2 Source | Annual CO2 Stored (MT/y) | Estimated CO2 Total Storage (MT) | Estimated CO2 Stored 2021 (MT) | Facility Type | Operator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joffre | 1982 | AB | Near Joffre | NOVA Chemical Ethylene Plant,(Joffre AB) | 0.02 | 5 | 1.5 | EOR-CCS | Whitecap Resources | |
Weyburn | 2000 | SK | Near Midale | SaskPower Boundary Dam Power Station (Estevan SK)
Great Plains Synfuel Plant (Beulah, ND) |
2.0 | 75 - 115 | 34.0 | EOR-CCS | Whitecap Resources | Table Note a |
Midale | 2005 | SK | Near Midale | Great Plains Synfuel Plant (Beulah, ND) | 0.19 | 32 | 5.0 | EOR-CCS | Cardinal Energy | Table Note b |
Chigwell | 2007 | AB | Near Ponoka | MEGlobal Prentiss 2 Ethylene Glycol Production facility (near Joffre, AB) | Table Note * | 3.7 | Table Note * | EOR-CCS | AlphaBow Energy | Table Note c |
Aquistone | 2009 | SK | Near Estevan | SaskPower Boundary Dam Power Station (Estevan SK) | Table Note * | 34 | 0.4 | Saline Aquifer | Petroleum Technology Research Center (PTRC) | Table Note d |
Quest | 2015 | AB | Near Thornhill | Scotford Upgrader (near Edmonton, AB) | 1.13 | 27 | 7.9 | Saline Aquifer | Shell Canada Ltd | Table Note e |
Clive | 2020 | AB | Near Clive | Agrium fertilizer plant (near Redwater, AB)
North West Sturgeon Refinery (near Redwater, AB) |
1.4 | 12.4 - 18.8 | 2.2 | EOR-CCS | Enhance Energy Inc. | Table Note f |
Sources
Sources: The Transition Accelerator (Review of Carbon Dioxide Storage Potential In Western Canada, August 2022), Alberta Energy (Quest 2022 report and ACTL 2021 report), Whitecap Resources Inc, PTRC – Aquistone.
Canada’s future CO2 storage potential
Western Canada’s potential for geological CO2 storage, without EOR, is significant. In a 2015 study by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Alberta has a medium estimate of 78.3 billion tonnes of CO2 storage, with Saskatchewan having an estimated 286.2 billion tonnes, Manitoba with 13.2 billion tonnes, and British Columbia with an estimated 1.87 billion tonnesFootnote 9. However, these estimates may be revised as more research is done. For example, a 2022 study by Geoscience BCFootnote 10 estimates that Northeast B.C. alone has a storage potential of 4.23 billion tonnes of CO2, more than four times the DOE’s 2015 estimate for the province. There is significant CO2 storage potential on Canada’s coasts as well: for example, the median estimate of CO2 storage offshore Nova Scotia is 177 billion tonnesFootnote 11. Canada’s wealth of CO2 storage capacity could theoretically store Canada’s annual CO2 emissions (708 million tonnes in 2022) for hundreds of years.
While EOR continues to offer a viable economic pathway for CCS in Canada, a growing number of projects under development are designed with dedicated geological storage, where CO2 is injected into a geological formation and stored without the production of oil. Currently, there are 11 CO2 storage facilities associated with CCS projects under development in western Canada (Table 2). Also, more than 25 new CCS projects were selected for evaluation by the Alberta government in 2022, with all of them either including carbon storage or relying on third party carbon storage.
Table 2: Canadian CCS projects with dedicated geological storage (modified from Global CCS Institute 2024)
Project name | Province | Project status | Expected Operation date | Project type | Capacity in Million Tonnes per Year (Mtpa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whitecap Resources Southeast Saskatchewan Hub | Saskatchewan | In development | 2024 | CO2 Transport / Storage | 4.2 |
Shell Atlas Carbon Storage Hub | Alberta | In construction | 2025 | CO2 Transport / Storage | TBD |
Shell Polaris (Scotford Complex) | Alberta | In construction | 2025 | Hydrogen and Chemicals | 0.65 |
Wolf Lamont Carbon Hub | Alberta | In development | 2025 | CO2 Transport / Storage | TBD |
Entropy Glacier Gas Plant Phase 2 | Alberta | In construction | 2026 | Power Generation and Heat | 0.16 |
Heidelberg Materials Edmonton Cement Plant | Alberta | In development | 2026 | Cement | 1 |
Strathcona Resources Cold Lake CCS Hub | Alberta | In development | 2026 | Oil Refining | 2.2 |
Heartland Generation Battle River Carbon Hub | Alberta | In development | 2027 | CO2 Transport / Storage | TBD |
Vault 44.01 Rocky Mountain Carbon Vault | Alberta | In development | 2027 | CO2 Transport / Storage | 1.0 - 1.3 |
Varme Energy and Gibson CCS | Alberta | In development | 2027 | Waste-to-Energy | 0.1 |
Pathways Alliance Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero | Alberta | In development | 2030 | Oil and Gas Production | TBD |
Sources
Sources: Global CCS Institute (Global Status of CCS 2024), NRCan, Entropy Inc, Heidelberg Materials, decarbdonnect (Wolf Lamont Carbon Hub, Strathcona Cold Lake CCUS Hub), Heartland Generation, Rocky Mountain Carbon, Gibson Energy, Government of Canada, Shell.
In Canada, provinces have jurisdiction over their subsurface resources and regulate certain CCS activities, including geological CO2 storage:
- Alberta has enacted a comprehensive regulatory framework for CCS. The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) regulates facilities that capture CO2, CO2 pipelines, and subsurface operations to store CO2Footnote 12.
- Saskatchewan’s Ministry of Energy and Resources regulates the development of CO2-dedicated underground storage in the province, as well as EOR-CCSFootnote 13.
- The British Columbia government passed the Energy Statutes Amendment Act in 2022 updating its regulatory framework on CCSFootnote 14. The B.C. Energy Regulator (BCER) is responsible for the regulation of CCS activity, including CO2 storageFootnote 15.
- On 4 June 2024, the Manitoba government passed the Captured Carbon Storage Act establishing a regulatory framework for licensing and operating CCS in the provinceFootnote 16.
- Ontario is taking a phased approach to enabling and regulating carbon storage in the province. In March 2023 it removed the prohibition to develop underground carbon storage. In June 2023 the Ontario government enacted an amendment of the Oil, Gas and Salt Resources Act to enable “special projects” for carbon storage demonstration projects, which was followed with its corresponding regulations in January 2024Footnote 17. As of August 2024, the province is currently working on the design of a regulatory framework for commercial geologic carbon storage projectsFootnote 18.
- Date modified: